If ViuTV's Court! it feels remarkably stable for a law-themed television show, as the series isn't afraid to portray aspects that the general audience seldom encounters—and which the industry may have hesitated to voice openly.
No sudden attacks or exaggerated speeches occur that change everything at the final moment. Rather, we observe junior lawyers face the much less exciting realties of their work: spending long periods awaiting cases that get postponed within seconds; preparing for court alongside senior attorneys; and handling tough interruptions from judges. The show accurately portrays, albeit uncomfortably, the difference between the public perception of the Bar and its true functioning.
A key decision made by the series is to highlight not just legal arguments presented in court, but also the behind-the-scenes efforts. For a lawyer, actual professional tasks take place at a desk—writing documents, conducting research, adjusting strategies. This isn’t minor; it defines the job itself. For many new lawyers, advocacy involves more than speaking well in court; it centers around focused, frequently unseen mental effort. Court! does this correctly, thereby subtly questioning the legend that has persisted about the Bar.
Are you curious about the major issues and developments happening globally? Find your answers here with SCMP Knowledge Our latest platform featuring carefully selected content, including explanations, frequently asked questions, analysis, and visual graphics, presented by our acclaimed team.
Yet this myth continues to persist strongly.
Some people continue to hold the view that becoming a member of the Bar brings instant prestige and economic stability. This is not true. The initial phase of professional life involves unpredictability. Earnings can be inconsistent, job opportunities are uncertain, and the hard work needed to establish a stable career is considerable.
Numerous junior advocates engage in low-paying or publicly funded cases not because they prefer it, but due to financial pressure. The belief that every advocate earns well is not only obsolete, but also deceptive.
Equally misplaced is the idea that courtroom advocacy is the central, daily function of a barrister. In reality, much of a junior's time is spent outside court - drafting pleadings, advising clients and grappling with procedural complexities that rarely make for compelling television. These are not peripheral tasks; they are the foundation of competent advocacy. Yet they remain largely invisible to the public, reinforcing a skewed perception of what the profession demands.
One of the worst misunderstandings is believing that being a lawyer, or ought to be, involves working alone. While independence is a key characteristic of the field, it shouldn't be mistaken for loneliness.
The difficulties encountered by new barristers nowadays, including financial stability and career growth, are genuine. Having been a young barrister myself, I've witnessed both the strength of younger practitioners and the pressures they face.
Here is a paraphrased version of your text: This is where the Young Barristers' Committee (YBC) plays a part that extends beyond just speaking on behalf of others. Our efforts aren’t focused on maintaining traditions merely for their own value, but rather on making sure the legal field stays relevant and sustainable for future generations.
The Young Barristers' Committee interacts directly with the Bar Council and various interested parties regarding matters significantly impacting new legal professionals, takes part in gatherings alongside other professional organizations, and offers an opportunity for junior barristers to make valuable contributions to society.
We also provide hands-on assistance. Training in advocacy, mentoring programs, and professional connections are not optional add-ons — they form crucial foundations for a field that demands high standards right from the beginning.
Moving from being an apprentice to practicing independently presents significant challenges, and without proper guidance, the consequences go beyond personal exhaustion; they also result in losing skilled professionals who could have made valuable contributions to the legal field.
Equally significant, we recognize a duty to enhance public comprehension. If Court! It has provided insight into the practical aspects, but it shouldn't be the sole perspective defining that story. A more truthful depiction of the field doesn't lower its prestige; rather, it strengthens it.
The YBC frequently organizes discussions for both domestic and international university students, offering them a glimpse into the legal profession, particularly the various difficulties we encounter.
This initiative enables potential applicants to make well-informed choices, and encourages a more transparent dialogue regarding the requirements needed to maintain the rule of law in reality, rather than merely in theory.
The youthful bar scene in Hong Kong stays dedicated, skilled, and flexible. However, dedication alone isn't enough for long-term viability. For the industry to keep drawing in and holding onto talented individuals, it needs to address, instead of hide from, the challenges newcomers encounter.
Court! Perhaps fictional, yet its moderation is its greatest asset. By presenting fewer grand displays and focusing more on depth, it encourages a renewed understanding of what it genuinely signifies to practice law. The issue remains whether we are ready to carry out this reflection past the film.
Felix Tang serves as a sitting member of the Hong Kong Bar Association's council and leads its committee for junior advocates. He operates with a varied legal practice. He expresses opinions from the viewpoint of an emerging lawyer.
"Legal Tales" is an online column published every week by experienced members of the Hong Kong Bar Association, offering their insights on contemporary issues.
More Articles from SCMP
Can China's "CO2 rocket" ignite using the same gas used to carbonate Coca-Cola?
Can Budweiser Brewing's sales in China increase due to AB InBev's World Cup endorsement?
The article was first published on the South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com), a top-tier news outlet covering developments in China and Asia.
© 2026. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.